Call us (786)-751-4283

Follow us

Dimly lit parking garage at night with poor visibility and inadequate lighting.

Negligent Security Claims

Attacked on Someone Else's Property? You May Have a Legal Claim

If you were assaulted, shot, robbed, or otherwise harmed because a property owner failed to provide reasonable security, CHG Personal Injury Lawyers can help you pursue compensation.

By CHG Lawyers · Published August 26, 2026

Negligent Security Claims: What to Do After an Attack on Someone Else’s Property

You were attacked, assaulted, shot, robbed, or sexually assaulted on someone else’s property. Maybe it was an apartment complex, a parking lot, a hotel, a bar, a gas station, or another business. You were injured because the property owner failed to provide basic security measures that would have prevented or stopped the crime.

You may have a legal claim against the property owner for negligent security. This is true even if the attacker was never caught or prosecuted.

This page explains how negligent security claims work in plain language, what you must prove, and what damages you may recover.

If you were assaulted, shot, robbed, or attacked on someone else's property because of inadequate security, you may have a legal claim against the property owner—and people in your situation reach out to us regularly for a free case evaluation. Talk it through with our team — the first consultation is free, confidential, and carries no obligation.

Broken chain and padlock on fence with car visible in background.

You Were Attacked—and the Owner May Be Legally Responsible

When you are harmed by a crime on someone else’s property, it is natural to blame the attacker. But the law also holds property owners accountable for their own negligence.

Property owners have a legal duty to keep their premises reasonably safe. They must take reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable crimes. When they fail—by ignoring broken locks, refusing to install lighting, not hiring security, or ignoring past incidents—and you are hurt as a result, you may have a claim against them.

This is not about excusing the attacker. It is about holding the property owner responsible for failing to provide the basic security measures that industry standards and the law require.

Florida law recognizes this duty. The legal principles apply nationwide, though specific rules vary by state.

What Is Negligent Security?

Negligent security is a property owner’s failure to provide reasonable security measures that would have prevented or stopped a foreseeable crime. It is a legal theory that allows crime victims to recover damages from the property owner. This is separate from any criminal prosecution of the attacker.

“Reasonable security” depends on context and what industry standards require for that type of property:

  • Parking garages need 24-hour lighting (minimum 5 foot-candles in parking areas, per industry standards), working security cameras covering all entry and exit points, and regular security patrols.
  • Apartment complexes need functioning deadbolts on all unit doors, a working gate or access-control system, adequate common-area lighting, and controlled entry to the building.
  • Hotels need trained front-desk staff, key-card access systems, surveillance cameras in hallways and common areas, and a documented protocol for responding to threats or complaints.
  • Bars need adequate staff on duty, the ability to identify and remove dangerous patrons, and a system for reporting threats to police.
  • Gas stations need bright lighting around pumps and the building, working security cameras, a panic button, and staff presence during late-night hours.

The property owner does not have to prevent every possible crime. But they do have to take reasonable steps to prevent crimes that are foreseeable given the property’s location, its history, the time of day, or the type of business.

The Five Elements You Must Prove

To win a negligent security claim, you must prove five key elements. Understanding these helps you see why your case may be strong—and what evidence matters most.

Element 1: Duty. The property owner owed you a legal duty of care. This is straightforward: property owners must maintain their premises in a reasonably safe condition and protect visitors from foreseeable harm, including foreseeable criminal acts. You do not have to be an employee or a paying tenant. If you were lawfully on the property, the owner owed you this duty.

Element 2: Breach. The property owner breached that duty by failing to provide adequate security. Concrete examples include:

  • Broken or missing locks on doors, gates, or entry points
  • Non-functional gates or access-control systems
  • Inadequate or absent lighting in parking areas, hallways, or common spaces
  • Non-working or absent security cameras, or cameras that do not cover key areas
  • Insufficient or untrained security staff, or no security presence at all
  • No incident response plan or failure to respond to threats
  • Failure to report crimes to police or to document incidents
  • Failure to warn tenants or visitors of known dangers
  • Failure to remove dangerous patrons from bars or businesses

Element 3: Foreseeability. The crime that harmed you was foreseeable. This means the property owner knew or should have known that crimes like yours were likely to occur at that location. Foreseeability is established through:

  • Prior incidents on the property: assaults, robberies, shootings, or sexual assaults documented in police reports or incident logs
  • The neighborhood’s crime history: crime statistics for the area, available through local police departments
  • The time of day: late-night or early-morning hours are higher-risk periods
  • The type of business: bars, ATMs, gas stations, and parking facilities are higher-risk environments
  • Industry standards: what security measures are standard for similar properties in similar locations

This is often the most important—and most heavily disputed—element.

Element 4: Causation. The inadequate security directly caused or contributed to your injury. In other words, reasonable security measures would likely have prevented the attack or reduced your harm. If the property had working locks, adequate lighting, or a security guard, would the crime have been prevented? If yes, causation is strong.

Element 5: Damages. You suffered real, measurable harm. This includes physical injury, medical bills, lost income, pain and suffering, or in the most tragic cases, the death of a loved one. You must document your losses to recover them.

How to Prove Foreseeability: The Power of Prior Incidents

Foreseeability is often the key to winning a negligent security case. Property owners cannot be held liable for random, unforeseeable crimes. But they can be held liable if crimes like yours were reasonably predictable.

Prior incidents on the property establish foreseeability. If the same apartment complex, parking lot, hotel, or bar has experienced assaults, robberies, shootings, or sexual assaults before, the owner knew or should have known that crime was a risk. This is powerful evidence.

Police reports, incident logs, complaints from other tenants or visitors, and news reports all document prior incidents and show a pattern.

In litigation, you can obtain police reports and incident logs through discovery—the legal process of exchanging evidence before trial. These records often reveal prior crimes that the property owner knew about but did nothing to prevent. A property with three prior assaults in the parking lot in two years, for example, has clear foreseeability of violent crime.

Foreseeability can also be established by the property’s location (a neighborhood with documented higher crime rates), the time of day (late night or early morning), the type of business (bars and ATMs are higher-risk), or industry standards for security at similar properties.

Common Locations Where Negligent Security Claims Arise

Negligent security claims occur at many types of properties. Here are the most common:

Apartment Complexes and Residential Buildings. Assaults, robberies, sexual assaults, and shootings in common areas, parking lots, or units due to broken locks, missing gates, poor lighting, or absent security. Tenants expect basic security; owners have a clear duty.

Parking Lots and Parking Garages. Robberies, assaults, and carjackings due to lack of lighting, no cameras, no security patrols, or poor visibility. These are high-risk environments where inadequate security is a common cause of injury.

Hotels and Motels. Sexual assaults, robberies, and assaults in rooms or common areas due to inadequate staff, poor key-card security, lack of cameras, or failure to respond to complaints or threats.

Bars and Nightclubs. Assaults and shootings due to inadequate staff, no security, poor crowd control, failure to remove dangerous patrons, or failure to report prior incidents to police.

Gas Stations and Convenience Stores. Robberies and assaults due to lack of lighting, no cameras, no panic buttons, or inadequate staff presence, especially during late-night hours.

ATMs. Robberies and assaults due to poor lighting, no cameras, no security, or location in high-crime areas without warning signs or security presence.

Retail Stores and Shopping Centers. Assaults and robberies due to inadequate security, poor lighting, or insufficient staff presence.

Each location type has its own industry standards and legal expectations for security. An attorney who focuses exclusively on negligent security cases knows what security measures are standard for your property type and location.

Not sure what your next step is?

Talk it through with our team — the first consultation is free, confidential, and carries no obligation.

You Do Not Need the Attacker to Be Caught to Sue the Property Owner

A common misconception stops many crime victims from pursuing claims: “The attacker was never caught, so I can’t sue the property owner.” This is wrong.

You do not need the attacker to be arrested, convicted, or even identified to bring a negligent security claim against the property owner. The negligent security claim is separate from any criminal case. The property owner’s liability is based on their own failure to provide adequate security—not on the attacker’s criminal conduct or prosecution.

If the attacker is caught and prosecuted, that information can support your claim. It proves the crime occurred and provides details. But it is not required. Your claim focuses on the property owner’s breach of duty, not on the attacker’s identity or prosecution.

Many victims wait for an arrest or conviction that never comes, thinking they cannot pursue a civil claim. Do not wait. The property owner’s liability exists regardless of whether the attacker is caught.

What Damages Can You Recover?

Damages in a negligent security case compensate you for your real losses:

  • Medical expenses: emergency care, surgery, rehabilitation, ongoing treatment, medications, medical devices, and future medical care
  • Lost wages and lost earning capacity: income you lost while recovering, and reduced earning ability if the injury is permanent
  • Pain and suffering: compensation for physical pain, discomfort, and the impact on your quality of life
  • Emotional distress and trauma: the psychological impact of the attack, including anxiety, depression, and PTSD
  • Disability and permanent impairment: compensation for permanent changes to your body, mobility, or function
  • In wrongful-death cases: funeral expenses, loss of companionship, and loss of financial support

The amount of damages depends on the severity of your injury, the impact on your life and ability to work, the quality of your medical evidence, and the strength of your claim against the property owner. Every case is unique.

Statute of Limitations: How Long Do You Have to File?

In Florida, the statute of limitations for a negligent security claim is generally four years from the date of injury for personal-injury claims and two years for wrongful-death claims. The deadline varies by state if the incident occurred outside Florida. Some circumstances can extend or shorten the deadline.

Time matters. Security footage is often deleted after 30 to 90 days. Evidence can disappear, and witnesses’ memories fade. The sooner you contact an attorney, the sooner you can preserve evidence and protect your rights.

What to Do Right After an Attack on Someone Else’s Property

Your immediate actions after an attack can protect your rights and preserve critical evidence:

  1. Seek immediate medical attention, even if your injuries seem minor. Document all injuries and all treatment. Medical records are crucial evidence.

  2. Report the incident to the property owner, manager, or security immediately and in writing. Ask for a written incident report. Keep a copy.

  3. Contact law enforcement and obtain a police report number. Keep a copy of the report. This creates an official record of the crime.

  4. Take photographs of the scene, including lighting (or lack of it), locks, gates, cameras, and any visible security failures. Photos are powerful evidence.

  5. Collect contact information from any witnesses. Their statements can support your claim.

  6. Preserve all evidence: medical records, receipts, photos, communications with the property owner, and any prior complaints or incidents you are aware of.

  7. Do not sign any waivers or settlement agreements without legal advice. Property owners and insurers may try to settle quickly and for far less than your claim is worth.

  8. Contact an attorney who focuses exclusively on negligent security claims as soon as possible. Early legal representation protects your rights and ensures evidence is preserved.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between a negligent security claim and a criminal case?

A criminal case is brought by the government against the attacker and focuses on punishing the crime. A negligent security claim is a civil case brought by you against the property owner and focuses on compensating you for your injuries. The two are separate, and you can pursue a negligent security claim even if the attacker is never prosecuted.

Can I recover damages if I was partially at fault for the attack?

Florida applies a modified comparative-negligence rule: if you are found more than 50% at fault, you generally cannot recover. If you are found 50% or less at fault, you can recover damages reduced by your percentage of fault. For example, if you are found 20% at fault and damages are $100,000, you recover $80,000. Being at a property where a crime occurs does not make you at fault for the crime itself.

What if the property owner claims they did not know about prior incidents?

Property owners have a duty to know about prior incidents on their property. If crimes have occurred and the owner claims ignorance, that is often evidence of negligence itself. They failed to maintain proper records or respond to complaints. In litigation, you can obtain police reports and incident logs through discovery, which often reveal prior crimes the owner knew about or should have known about.

How much is a negligent security claim worth?

The value depends on the severity of your injury, your medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, permanent impairment, and the strength of your claim. Some claims are worth tens of thousands of dollars; others are worth substantially more. An attorney can evaluate your specific case based on comparable cases and the facts of your injury.

What if I signed a waiver or release after the attack?

Do not assume the waiver is valid. Many waivers are unenforceable, especially if they were signed under duress, without legal advice, or if they conflict with public policy. Contact an attorney immediately to review any document you signed.


If you were assaulted, shot, robbed, or attacked on someone else's property because of inadequate security, you may have a legal claim against the property owner—and people in your situation reach out to us regularly for a free case evaluation. Talk it through with our team — the first consultation is free, confidential, and carries no obligation.

Dome security camera mounted on concrete wall for surveillance monitoring.

Your Next Step: Free Case Evaluation

If you were assaulted, shot, robbed, or attacked on someone else’s property because of inadequate security, you may have a legal claim against the property owner. The property owner’s failure to provide reasonable security—broken locks, poor lighting, no cameras, inadequate staff, or ignoring prior crimes—can make them liable for your injuries and losses.

Time matters. Evidence disappears, memories fade, and the statute of limitations is limited. The sooner you reach out, the sooner we can investigate your case, preserve evidence, and begin building your claim.

Contact us today for a free case evaluation. Our attorneys focus exclusively on catastrophic-injury cases, including negligent security claims. We handle cases nationwide and have the experience and resources to take on property owners and their insurers. You do not have to face this alone.

This is attorney advertising. The information provided is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome, and contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship.

What Is a Negligent Security Claim?

The Situation

You were attacked—assaulted, shot, robbed, or sexually assaulted—on someone else's property: an apartment complex, parking lot or garage, hotel, bar, gas station, store, or ATM. The property owner or manager failed to provide reasonable security measures like working locks, adequate lighting, cameras, or security personnel.

The Legal Claim

A negligent security claim is a civil lawsuit against the property owner for failing to protect you. It is separate from any criminal case against the attacker. You can pursue this claim even if the attacker is never caught or prosecuted.

The Goal

Compensation for your catastrophic injuries, medical care, lost income, pain and suffering, and other damages caused by the attack that the property owner's negligence enabled or failed to prevent.

Why It Matters

Property owners have a legal duty to maintain reasonably safe premises. When they ignore known security risks or fail to respond to prior incidents, they can be held accountable for the harm that results.

Why These Claims Are Important

Property Owners Are Accountable

Owners and managers who ignore security risks or fail to respond to known dangers can be held legally responsible for the injuries that result.

Your Injuries Are Catastrophic

Attacks often cause life-altering harm: spinal cord injuries, paralysis, traumatic brain injuries, severe burns, amputations, or fatal outcomes. These deserve full compensation.

Evidence Tells the Story

Prior incidents, maintenance records, security logs, police reports, and witness statements can prove the owner knew or should have known about the security risk.

Time Matters

Evidence can disappear and memories fade. The sooner you act, the sooner we can preserve critical information and begin building your claim.

Do Not Settle or Sign Anything Without Legal Counsel

Property owners and their insurers often make quick settlement offers to resolve claims cheaply. Before you accept any offer or sign documents, speak with an attorney who focuses exclusively on catastrophic injury claims. An early offer may not reflect the full value of your case.

What to Do Right Now

Preserve Evidence

Request all security footage from the date of the attack. Document the property's condition—poor lighting, broken locks, lack of cameras, or missing guards. Take photos and note the names and contact information of any witnesses.

Gather Your Medical Records

Collect all emergency room reports, hospital records, imaging studies, surgical reports, and ongoing treatment documentation. These records establish the severity and permanence of your injuries.

Report to Police

File a police report if you have not already. Obtain a copy of the report number and any incident details. This creates an official record of the attack.

Contact CHG Personal Injury Lawyers

Reach out for a free case evaluation. We focus exclusively on catastrophic injury claims and can advise you on your legal options, protect your rights, and handle all communication with the property owner and insurers.

How CHG Personal Injury Lawyers Can Help

Investigate the Security Failure

We examine the property's security history, prior incidents, maintenance records, and the owner's response—or lack of response—to known risks.

Build Your Claim

We gather evidence, obtain police and medical records, identify witnesses, and work with experts to establish liability and the full scope of your damages.

Handle All Communication

We negotiate with insurers, manage settlement discussions, and protect you from pressure to accept inadequate offers.

Pursue Full Compensation

We seek recovery for medical expenses, ongoing care, lost income, pain and suffering, and other damages caused by the attack and the owner's negligence.

Common Questions

Can I sue if the attacker was never caught?

Yes. A negligent security claim targets the property owner's failure to provide reasonable security—not the attacker's identity or prosecution. You can pursue this claim regardless of whether the attacker is identified or prosecuted.

What if I was partially at fault?

Florida law allows recovery even if you bear some responsibility. An attorney can explain how this may affect your claim and what compensation you may still pursue.

How long do I have to file a claim?

Time limits apply to negligent security claims. Contact us immediately to discuss your situation and ensure your claim is filed within the required window.

What if the property owner claims they are not liable?

Property owners often deny responsibility or claim the attack was unforeseeable. We gather evidence of prior incidents, known security gaps, and industry standards to prove negligence and hold them accountable.

Related practice areas

Call Now — Free Consultation (786) 751-4283